Canon EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Standard Zoom Lens for Canon DSLR Cameras
- Standard zoom lens; 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6
- Canon’s Optical Image Stabilizer technology allows sharp hand-held shots at shutter speeds up to four stops slower than otherwise possible
- 11 elements in 9 groups; aspherical lens element to correct aberration
- For EOS 50D, 40D, 30D, 20D, 20Da, Rebel XSi/XS, Digital Rebel XTi/XT and Digital Rebel cameras
Product Description
Compact, lightweight and a wide magnification range – this standard zoom lens features a wide focal length range from normal to telephoto equivalent to 29-320mm in the 35mm format. It features an Optical Image Stabilizer for up to 4-stops of effective correction even at full zoom. Since Canon’s optical image stabilization system is in the lens, not in the camera, you can see the stabilized, steadier images through the viewfinder. And the circular aperture can give beautiful background blur effects. This new wide zoom ratio EF-S lens delivers excellent high-speed performance at an affordable price…. More >>
Canon EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Standard Zoom Lens for Canon DSLR Cameras
HOT Electronic Gadgets deal of the Month - 8GB Apple IPOD
Click here to get the cheapest Apple 8GB Ipod deal online - Includes free delivery.
Click here to get the cheapest Apple 8GB Ipod deal online - Includes free delivery.
Posted in 
Tags:
I didn’t realize this when I bought it but this lens does not fit the Canon 10D. I don’t understand why a company like Canon (and others) sell high end products and then make lens that don’t fit!!
Rating: 1 / 5
I’m sure this lens provides fine optical performance. Just about every Canon lens, including the much disparaged 18-55, is just fine. But this lens is clearly in the same category with cheap kit lenses before it: no full-time manual focus, no usm, flimsy plastic. All this for five times the price of an 18-55! I looked at the lens at a camera store, saw the price, gave it back to the salesman and left. And I really would love to use a lens with such versatility. I would overlook the unavoidable distortion that would come along with such an extreme zoom and revel in the thrill of never changing a lens! Alas, I passed this one up.
Hopefully if enough people do the same, Canon will be forced to bring this lens up to the same build standard as this far superior lens: Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM SLR Lens for EOS Digital SLRs. How much more expensive would it need to be? I’m pretty sure many of us would pay the price to have a lens more like the 10-22 and less like this.
———
update to review
————-
I have used this lens since writing this review. I borrowed it for a day from someone who likes the photos I make (I just wish I could be as happy with my photos as this person). And my opinion has not changed in the slightest. It has the wide end distortion I expected and it handles and operates like the cheap 18-55 kit lens I already own. Worst of all, it does not have a true “usm” focusing motor, thus no full-time manual focus. Oh well, I make better shots with a prime lens anyway (makes me work harder to frame shots). What a drag. Maybe I should try nikon. They make an 18-200 that kicks a$$. (I still like canon just fine. Just check out that 10-22 I mentioned.)
Rating: 2 / 5
Not knowing what to expect really from a lens in this day and age, you would think they would have it down to a science by now, but the Canon EF-S 18-200 IS telephoto lens seems to be acceptable, as part of a package with my Canon EOS Digital 50D, oh what a deal I thought here on Amazon! As all prior review’s behind me state here, performance beyond the norm of both entities, only one thing I haven’t read, please join me if you experience this as well.
For either I am one of a handful, or this just hasn’t come out in the public’s eye, but this lens although it seems keep up to Canon performance and reputation, the fact in this so-called “lens creep” issue, if you haven’t heard, being that this particular lens cannot hold it’s position beyond 70mm and slides out to full 200mm downward extension on vertical aspect making a macroshot out of the question, and slams down on upward vertical back down to 50mm if the lens is extended upward aspect. Of course, unless you manually reach under the lens and engage a manual lens lock? Is this lens “defective” or can one say “typical”? As the is potentially smelling of seemingly some “quality control issue”. Or was it Canon was just not putting it’s heart into a multi-focal lens rat race at it’s attempt at keeping up with the Joneses. Is it NORMAL in a telphoto lens to slip like this? Please share! And as well to really deem it in a “Travel Lens” category, this is not a multi-use lens, but just a packaged OEM lens there schloffing off, as to dump on unsuspecting patrons who just want versatility? I mean I could have saved some major $$$ and went Sigma, but I chose the honorable Canon….mistake? This should not be brushed under the rug.
I found out the hard way, making fruitless atempts at tech support (just babble) to address this “Lens Creep” experience has proved to be a simple brush-off from Canon with this issue. As my recent Canon warranty factory repair attempts have proven. Attempts to correct this on my newly purchased lens was jockyed back literally overnight as being “NORMAL WHEN LENS IS NOT LOCKED”. The funny thing was, my “Screening” at the Canon Factory Service Center Reception desk, the young assertive female representative at the Intake Portal or “Reception” seemed astute and genuinely concerned that my claims were valid and wrote me up a repair order. And this only after my careful demonstration, she seemed to agree, yes there was a problem here. But the Canon backlot at this Canon Facility, in the repair facilty, unfortunately didn’t share her or my own’s claims of there was any form of malfunction with this lens or deviation from the norm. Even though at my taking a day off, and to walk-in at this Canon’s Repair Facility, and as they put me through the motions of being concerned, they ended up with my lens just being returned, in two days!!, And at that, with it performing even worse than before it went in, no exageration only exasperation here. It literally slams in and out with no sort of resistance.
As Canon isn’t talking or putting anything in the way of admission of guilt here obviously, they deny anything wrong with a telephoto lens that slips or even slams in and out as one attempts to photograph wildlife, birds, plant, etc. I find this unacceptable, that a lens promoted such as this should not have position slip like this, or am I CrAZy…?
Please join in….voice your opinion please, without the arrogance or techno-babble thanx?
Rating: 2 / 5
The lens is soft at its widest – especially on the edges. A real bummer.
The lens is fast – works very good when I photograph sports or dance performance. It is just not as clear and crisp as I want it to be.
For the money – half way to an L lens – save your money and get the 70-200 L or 24-105 L
Rating: 3 / 5
I use this lens for picturing my daughter ballroom dances.
This lens is fast in low light. Very satisfied with the results.
Cons: a little expensive.
Rating: 5 / 5